Hi Zhesen, The components are meant for the zaku branch in noxrepo.org.
Regards KK On 12 October 2011 11:29, Zhesen ZHANG <zhe...@nttmcl.com> wrote: > Hi KK, > > We cannot build the bicast on the nox-0.8.9 since there is no > flowdb, mobiledb and routeinstaller in the source code. > > We put the bicast under the netapps/ > > Which version of nox should we build and what is the purpose > flowdb, mobiledb? > > Thank you very much! > > Best regards, > > Zhesen > > -----Original Message----- > From: yap...@gmail.com [mailto:yap...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of kk yap > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 2:54 PM > To: Zhesen Zhang > Cc: zhe...@nttmcl.com > Subject: Re: zhesen's email address > > Hi Zhesen, > > I am not that clear about my schedule next week as yet. I am not > doing much, but will help others as it becomes necessary. I suspect > you can catch me on an adhoc basis and I should probably be free. > > I also just sent an email about the scripts for bicast. Hope you got it. > > Regards > KK > > On 9 October 2011 21:23, Zhesen Zhang <zhe...@ymail.com> wrote: >> Hi KK, >> It's very glad to hear from you. >> it's OK, I understood you must be very busy for conference. >> Thank you for explaining to me about the bicast. I see. >> How about your schedule, have any chance to meet you >> before the conference or we have to wait until the >> conference closed. >> >> Regarding the openflow question, I will ask on the >> mailing list next time. sorry for that. >> >> By the way, did you happened to have the bicast script. >> Thanks again! >> Best regards, >> Zhesen >> >> ________________________________ >> From: kk yap <yap...@stanford.edu> >> To: Zhesen Zhang <zhe...@ymail.com> >> Cc: Zhesen ZHANG <zhe...@nttmcl.com> >> Sent: Sunday, October 9, 2011 2:46 PM >> Subject: Re: zhesen's email address >> >> Hi Zhesen, >> >> Sorry for the delay in replying. Things are rather hectic in Stanford. >> >> It seems like you have misunderstood the bicast setup. The setup >> manipulates both the APs, base-stations and the OpenFlow switches, >> which means you need to have the entire setup before anything else is >> going to be useful. >> >> Regards >> KK >> >> PS>> I would prefer such email to be sent to the mailing list for >> issues of openness and fairness. Hope that works well for you too. >> >> On 29 September 2011 22:41, Zhesen Zhang <zhe...@ymail.com> wrote: >>> Dear Mr. Yap, >>> This is my email address, it is very nice to talk with you. >>> Please feel free to let me know your schedule after you >>> finished the conference preparation. >>> I appreciate so much if you can send me the bicast script >>> so I can test it. >>> Another question is that I want to double check with you that >>> is the bicast script only the script in the n-casting experiment and >>> does the bicast script control the access point and WiMAX >>> base station only, not control the OpenFlow switch. >>> if so can I understand that in the very simple network topology as >>> one client laptop, two access points, one streaming server and >>> one NOX control server, even there is no the OpenFlow switch I >>> still can test the n-casting experiment. I am so not confident about the >>> OpenFlow switch needs in n-casting, so any information will be help. >>> Again I am very sorry to disturb you at this time, sorry about this. >>> Thanks, >>> Best regards, >>> Zhesen Zhang >>> >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ openflow-discuss mailing list openflow-discuss@lists.stanford.edu https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss
