>This forum is about open systems. Is there a successful argument that >open systems will deliver, say a prescribing system, that follows a >different (and better?) purpose then the other 20 or so commerical >prescribing systems? Very hard to argue with this point, Wayne. What's the answer? I don't mean to be flippant, and I take back what I said about David Eddy. But take a look at that crystal ball and tell me what it says. John
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Andrew Ho
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics John S. Gage
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Jeremy Rogers
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics John S. Gage
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Wayne Wilson
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Jeremy Rogers
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics John S. Gage
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Wayne Wilson
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Wayne Wilson
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Tim Cook
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics John S. Gage
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Jeremy Rogers
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Philippe AMELINE
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics John S. Gage
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Adrian Midgley
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics John S. Gage
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Wayne Wilson
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Andrew Ho
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Adrian Midgley
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics Calle Hedberg
- Re: Ontologies and Linguistics philippe Ameline
