>This forum is about open systems.  Is there a successful argument that 
>open systems will deliver, say a prescribing system, that follows a 
>different (and better?) purpose then the other 20 or so commerical 
>prescribing systems?

Very hard to argue with this point, Wayne.  What's the answer?  I don't 
mean to be flippant, and I take back what I said about David Eddy.  But 
take a look at that crystal ball and tell me what it says.

John


Reply via email to