> We might need an openhealth-talk mailing list, to preserve the bandwidth > of the main one for things of interest outside OSHCA. I mean lurkers > don't relish organisational detail. > Reliability of the list is a necessity, multiplication and dilution are > already harmful.
Agreed. But lets get to a formal, (as in not initial) committee level before we split off to a new list. Until that time I think there will be a few details that regular list members might need to ignore, but I think we need to stay close to the community at large for the large issues of direction and purpose. Even after that I think we can make our precense tolerable by clearly labeling our mail as OSCHA Business... I know that lists, after a time, simply grow cold. I would much rather have a list that has too much than two lists with less than enough. -FT [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/T8sf5C/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/W4wwlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
