I think what Will, Molly, Tim and others are suggesting is that we allow Molly to register the organization were it is most convient for her, (since she has been the one pushing for this) and then allowing the organization itself to consider registering or not registering OSHCA in other places on an as needed basis.
I see no reason why OSHCA cannot change its registration or duplicate it registration much later in the process. Frankly as an organization OSCHA will have lots to do before duplicating the structure of the organization becomes important. Ultimatley it is important to support those people who are working to get OSCHA off the ground. Let them decide when and if to register in the US, France, Canada or anywhere else. If you want to have influense on that decision, then consider running for a position in OSCHA when the time comes for that. That is really the appropriate way to get what you want. In the mean time, the best way to hedge your bets for winning such an election is to be as helpful to the process as possible. Please note that one helpful thing to do in processes like this is simply to listen silently until they ask for specific help... -FT -- Fred Trotter SynSeer, Consultant http://www.fredtrotter.com http://www.synseer.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
