Joseph
Thomas Beale wrote:
>
> I have to agree with Dave here - I see it as problematic if OSHCA
> doesn't see interoperability as a key issue. FOSS just gets you
> applications and components. Interoperable FOSS gets you integrated,
> componentised systems and environments. This is where the cost advantage
> of FOSS will be shown in the future. It is worth considering the
> ObjectWeb approach (http://www.objectweb.org).
>
> - thomas
>
> --
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> CTO Ocean Informatics (http://www.OceanInformatics.biz)
> Research Fellow, University College London (http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk)
> Chair Architectural Review Board, openEHR (http://www.openEHR.org)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> * Visit your group "openhealth
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openhealth>" on the web.
>
> * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> .
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "openhealth" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
