So, is this a proposal to have axschemas.org blessed (perhaps by the OIDF)?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, John Bradley <[email protected]> wrote: > Good point. It would be nice to have one place to document schema. > > The ICF has a claims dictionary as well. > > If we could consolidate that would be an improvement. > > Do people have an opinion on trying to do something cross protocol. > > openID, Information Cards, and SAML or should we do something on our own. > > John B. > On 2009-09-16, at 5:22 PM, Dick Hardt wrote: > >> >> axschema.org is shorter then schemas.openid.net and implies the >> schemas could be used for things other then OpenID >> >> given that though, I don't have a strong preference >> >> On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote: >> >>> As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use schemas.openid.net. >>> >>> Is that still the preferred option from your point of view, or do >>> you see axshema.org continuing in some way? >>> >>> John B. >>> >>> On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dick, >>>>> >>>>> That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents? >>>> >>>> All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that anyone else >>>> contributed. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Who controls axschema.org now? >>>> >>>> I do personally >>>> >>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > specs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs > -- --Breno +1 (650) 214-1007 desk +1 (408) 212-0135 (Grand Central) MTV-41-3 : 383-A PST (GMT-8) / PDT(GMT-7) _______________________________________________ specs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
