Besides, the participation is free there in Kantara, which is a big plus. =nat
Nat Sakimura wrote: > Hi John, > > MS an the US Gov agree on a place for this is as important as other > governments and telcos as well. ISO or ITU-T could be one place, but > that would be too heavy weight. Using a place like Kantara, which is > very light weight in starting a WG and has telco and other gov > participation, as an interim home towards ISO/ITU-T seem like a good > option to me. > > =nat > > John Bradley wrote: >> I have to say that this is the most interest I have seen in the topic >> for a while. >> >> I am a Kantara member as well. However I know not everyone is 100% >> onboard with it being a neutral place. Nat I know you try your best >> to achieve that. >> >> I would like to see everyone including MS and the US Gov agree on a >> place for this. >> >> That could be Kantara but I don't want to pre judge the sentiment. >> >> John B. >> On 2009-09-16, at 8:38 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote: >> >>> In Japan, we are starting the work to make a matching table for >>> selected SAML metadata (selected by Mobile Contents Forum: about 600 >>> of them) and OpenID AX schema. For this kind of thing, it is quite >>> important to involve telco as well, IMHO. In this regard, as a >>> forum, Kantara seems to be one of the good place to do. >>> >>> As to the URL, I prefer shorter one, but axschema.org >>> <http://axschema.org> does not represent a short URL to me. >>> Something akin of bit.ly etc. is much shorter. Having said that, I >>> am ok with axschema.org <http://axschema.org> as well, if it can be >>> transferred to an international non-profit. >>> >>> =nat >>> >>> Breno de Medeiros wrote: >>>> So, is this a proposal to have axschemas.org <http://axschemas.org> >>>> blessed (perhaps by the OIDF)? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, John Bradley <john.brad...@wingaa.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Good point. It would be nice to have one place to document schema. >>>>> >>>>> The ICF has a claims dictionary as well. >>>>> >>>>> If we could consolidate that would be an improvement. >>>>> >>>>> Do people have an opinion on trying to do something cross protocol. >>>>> >>>>> openID, Information Cards, and SAML or should we do something on our own. >>>>> >>>>> John B. >>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 5:22 PM, Dick Hardt wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> axschema.org <http://axschema.org> is shorter then schemas.openid.net >>>>>> <http://schemas.openid.net> and implies the >>>>>> schemas could be used for things other then OpenID >>>>>> >>>>>> given that though, I don't have a strong preference >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use schemas.openid.net >>>>>>> <http://schemas.openid.net>. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is that still the preferred option from your point of view, or do >>>>>>> you see axshema.org <http://axshema.org> continuing in some way? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> John B. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Dick, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that anyone else >>>>>>>> contributed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who controls axschema.org <http://axschema.org> now? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I do personally >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> specs mailing list >>>>> sp...@lists.openid.net >>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>
_______________________________________________ specs mailing list sp...@lists.openid.net http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
