For the time-being is it possible to extend axschema.org? Dick?
Cheers,
Chris Obdam
Stichting OpenID NL (Dutch OpenID foundation)
Op 17 sep 2009, om 04:06 heeft John Bradley het volgende geschreven:
I am in favour of this being international.
One reason for OIDs :)
Lots of people have taken runs at this over the years.
If people are serious about nailing down the semantics as well as
the URI it may be worth the effort.
I will one up your Kantara with a OASIS WG. That could go to the
ISO/ITU-T as well.
I am not opposed to Kantara but would like to draw out peoples
opinions.
John B.
On 2009-09-16, at 9:05 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
Hi John,
MS an the US Gov agree on a place for this is as important as other
governments and telcos as well. ISO or ITU-T could be one place,
but that would be too heavy weight. Using a place like Kantara,
which is very light weight in starting a WG and has telco and other
gov participation, as an interim home towards ISO/ITU-T seem like a
good option to me.
=nat
John Bradley wrote:
I have to say that this is the most interest I have seen in the
topic for a while.
I am a Kantara member as well. However I know not everyone is
100% onboard with it being a neutral place. Nat I know you try
your best to achieve that.
I would like to see everyone including MS and the US Gov agree on
a place for this.
That could be Kantara but I don't want to pre judge the sentiment.
John B.
On 2009-09-16, at 8:38 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
In Japan, we are starting the work to make a matching table for
selected SAML metadata (selected by Mobile Contents Forum: about
600 of them) and OpenID AX schema. For this kind of thing, it is
quite important to involve telco as well, IMHO. In this regard,
as a forum, Kantara seems to be one of the good place to do.
As to the URL, I prefer shorter one, but axschema.org does not
represent a short URL to me.
Something akin of bit.ly etc. is much shorter. Having said that,
I am ok with axschema.org as well, if it can be transferred to an
international non-profit.
=nat
Breno de Medeiros wrote:
So, is this a proposal to have axschemas.org blessed (perhaps by
the OIDF)?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, John Bradley <john.brad...@wingaa.com
> wrote:
Good point. It would be nice to have one place to document
schema.
The ICF has a claims dictionary as well.
If we could consolidate that would be an improvement.
Do people have an opinion on trying to do something cross
protocol.
openID, Information Cards, and SAML or should we do something
on our own.
John B.
On 2009-09-16, at 5:22 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
axschema.org is shorter then schemas.openid.net and implies the
schemas could be used for things other then OpenID
given that though, I don't have a strong preference
On 2009-09-16, at 2:06 PM, John Bradley wrote:
As I recall the idea was to move the URI to use
schemas.openid.net.
Is that still the preferred option from your point of view,
or do
you see axshema.org continuing in some way?
John B.
On 2009-09-16, at 4:54 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
On 2009-09-16, at 12:28 PM, John Bradley wrote:
Dick,
That includes all of the schema work and AX 2.0 documents?
All the work that Sxip Identity did. I don't recall that
anyone else
contributed.
Who controls axschema.org now?
I do personally
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
