Tony Tony Tony, how I've missed our time together
The WG's mandate is to profile OIDC to enable an SSO model for native
mobile applications.
Can you suggest a better (concise & memorable) descriptor for a mail
list identifier?
paul
On 7/17/13 2:17 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
That's a totally useless name
*From:*openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net
[mailto:openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net] *On Behalf Of *Paul Madsen
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 10:59 AM
*To:* Mike Jones
*Cc:* John Bradley; sp...@openid.net; John Ehrig; Don Thibeau
*Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
that list name is fine
thanks
On 7/17/13 1:51 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
John, are you able to create the new mailing list at
lists.openid.net or do we have to ask supp...@osuosl.org
<mailto:supp...@osuosl.org> for the list creation?
Paul and other WG creators, what name do you want the list to
have? openid-specs-native-sso?
-- Mike
*From:*Don Thibeau [mailto:d...@oidf.org]
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 17, 2013 5:03 AM
*To:* Paul Madsen
*Cc:* n-sakimura; John Ehrig; openid-specs@lists.openid.net
<mailto:openid-specs@lists.openid.net>; John Bradley; Mike Jones
*Subject:* Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
John Ehrig can set up the web site space and the online Docusign
process for IPR collection. If done right away it saves all
concerned lots of time and hassle.
Don Thibeau
The OpenID Foundation <http://openid.net>
On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Paul Madsen wrote:
Thanks Nat,
Don, can you direct me to whomever I should work with on the WG
list & page logistics?
Paul
On 7/16/13 6:08 AM, n-sakimura wrote:
The WG formation is deemed to be approved per section 4.2 of
the OpenID Process Document v.1.5 of 2009.
A new mailing list should be established promptly per section
4.3 of the above document. Also, a WG web pages should be set
up at openid.net <http://openid.net>. You should also ask the
secretary of the foundation to announce the first meeting of
the WG, in which scope approval and the chairs selection
should be done.
Note: the first meeting can only be done after the WG has
collected the IPR agreement from the participants, so it may
not be as quick as you may wish, but it has to be done. BTW,
NRI's agreement is already in as we have a blanket agreement
like Google.
Nat
(2013/07/15 14:56), Paul Madsen wrote:
Next steps?
-----------
Paul Madsen
Ping Identity
Anthony Nadalin<tony...@microsoft.com>
<mailto:tony...@microsoft.com> wrote:
I believe if you dig you will see that there is potential for
IPR from both Apple and Facebook.
-----Original Message-----
From: openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net
<mailto:openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net>
[mailto:openid-specs-boun...@lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of
n-sakimura
Sent: Wednesday, July 3, 2013 10:20 PM
To: openid-specs@lists.openid.net
<mailto:openid-specs@lists.openid.net>
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Native application SSO Working Group
Could you kindly spell it out?
From what I have been hearing, Facebook was just using fast
application switch, which is nothing more than Self-issued
thing that we have, and iOS's native login support given to
facebook, twitter, and Weibo.
Perhaps you are thinking of something else.
Of course, I could be complete wrong. I should probably read
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/howtos/ios-6/
and
http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/Social/Reference/Social_Framework/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40012233
as well.
Having said that, if Apple's interface is not open, perhaps it
is a task for an industry consortia like OpenID Foundation to
go and ask Apple to open up the API for other IdPs as well. Do
not know if they are going to listen, but still, it might be
our duty to try.
Nat
(2013/07/04 7:30), Anthony Nadalin wrote:
I also have a concern that we might be infringing on the
Facebook SSO
(iOS) IPR with this effort.
--
Nat Sakimura (n-sakim...@nri.co.jp <mailto:n-sakim...@nri.co.jp>)
Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
Tel:+81-3-6274-1412 <tel:+81-3-6274-1412> Fax:+81-3-6274-1547
PLEASE READ:
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution
or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete your copy from your system.
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net <mailto:sp...@lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net <mailto:sp...@lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs
_______________________________________________
specs mailing list
sp...@lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs