As long as Anyone contribute a bit on some real projects and problems , there is always room for change in some future or something over branding.
But currently I would rather shoot myself in the foot then changing branding in a moments mostly crucial to the distribution and core OS future. (And crucial moments are already all the time from the beginning - there is still to come stable OI release that could be recommended for production use an from where wider audience could be gathered. I woud rather like to see X server drivers (intel) movements , Xen support resurrected and High Availability put into the move and software porting community refreshed with more coherent IPS publishers hosted around. And newcomer contributors mentoring facilities. OI is what you get when you put uname -a and there and is already in a number of software and scripts using it to identify platform. I think that further changes in branding could be considered when development community is at least 10X the present volume. (And there IS a space for branched distributions production - a la Ubuntu,etc) If we put $5-10 in a Jar or spend hour or two on some distribution's coordinated effort, - every time we got Eureka idea about branding, then I wouldn't mind any great branding ideas. On 6/21/11, oi-disc...@mho.nu <oi-disc...@mho.nu> wrote: > In message <15a2f120-d24b-43dc-8cd6-2417182e7...@yonderway.com>, Magnus > writes: >> >>On Jun 20, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Tim Aslat wrote: >>> >>> How about FlareOS (offshoot of the Sun) > > I like FlareOS (or flareix, perhaps) > > - mho > > _______________________________________________ > OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list > OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ OpenIndiana-discuss mailing list OpenIndiana-discuss@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss