Alex, Thanks for the fixes!
On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 2:15 AM Alex Gorouvein <[email protected]> wrote: > > On the blank CPU panel on SPARC — I don't have SPARC hardware to test > against, so if you get a chance, `kstat -p cpu_stat:0` on that machine > would help me see whether the counter names or layout differ from what the > collector expects. Ah, I see the problem. There isn't a cpu 0. That's true in general - the cpu id doesn't have to start at 0, and the list doesn't have to be contiguous. Especially on SPARC, where the cpu id comes from system topology rather than being simply enumerated. On this system, the id is the range 64-127. So the logic that loops over 0-63 misses everything. -- -Peter Tribble https://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - https://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
