Thank you for clarification, Peter. I will ensure my next patch incorporates this and the three previously mentioned issues.
Just curious, which SPARC machine do you have? Many years ago I had a headless SS5. Alex On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 5:12 AM Peter Tribble <[email protected]> wrote: > Alex, > > Thanks for the fixes! > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2026 at 2:15 AM Alex Gorouvein <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On the blank CPU panel on SPARC — I don't have SPARC hardware to test > > against, so if you get a chance, `kstat -p cpu_stat:0` on that machine > > would help me see whether the counter names or layout differ from what > the > > collector expects. > > Ah, I see the problem. There isn't a cpu 0. That's true in general - the > cpu id > doesn't have to start at 0, and the list doesn't have to be > contiguous. Especially > on SPARC, where the cpu id comes from system topology rather than being > simply enumerated. On this system, the id is the range 64-127. So the logic > that loops over 0-63 misses everything. > > -- > -Peter Tribble > https://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - https://ptribble.blogspot.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > openindiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ openindiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/openindiana-discuss
