There was a mirror, but it was unofficial and one-way (OpenJDK ->
BitBucket). I believe (although my memory may be failing me) that it was
operated by Danno, so he might have more to say.
In regards to fork / pull-request vs patch-file, I have no arguments
there. Of course, OpenJFX is part of the OpenJDK, and therefore makes
use of the OpenJDK infrastructure. My main point is that any movement
regarding infrastructure is guided by an over-arching infrastructure
team, in conjunction with the OpenJDK masters. OpenJFX can't work
independent of this.
-- Jonathan
On 18/03/2015 10:50 a.m., Florian Brunner wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK there is/ was a mirror of OpenJFX at BitBucket.
I think the URL was https://bitbucket.org/openjfxmirrors, but it's not valid
anymore.
Is there still a mirror of OpenJFX at BitBucket?
A fork/pull-request workflow is state-of-the-art nowadays in software
development and way better than a patch-file based workflow IMHO.
It would be great to have such a fork/pull-request workflow also for OpenJFX!
-Florian
