Looks like Gluon has moved SceneBuilder from Bitbucket for GitHub. https://github.com/gluonhq/scenebuilder I like this move. GitHub is much better to work with.
Den fre. 27. apr. 2018 kl. 13:31 skrev Sverre Moe <sverre....@gmail.com>: > > I would like to hear from Gluon about their work on SceneBuilder. > Do they have any plans for improve on SceneBuilder, both bug fixed and > new features? > > I guess Gluon only work on their own fork of SceneBuilder, but do they > send changes back to the OpenJFX repository? > > We have migrated our application from Swing to JavaFX and have thus > begun to use SceneBuilder. I therefor hope it will be actively > maintained further. > > How can we the community contribute to the continued development of > SceneBuilder. > Should we work against the OpenJFX SceneBuilder or the Gluon SceneBuilder? > https://bitbucket.org/gluon-oss/scenebuilder > https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/tree/develop/apps/scenebuilder > > /Sverre > > > 2018-03-13 22:11 GMT+01:00 Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > > That will be a question for Gluon. > > > > -- Kevin > > > > > > > > Michael Paus wrote: > >> > >> How will these changes then be synchronized with the work Gluon is doing > >> for the version > >> distributed by them? Do they work on the same repo? > >> > >> Am 12.03.18 um 23:25 schrieb Kevin Rushforth: > >>> > >>> Hi Florian, > >>> > >>> By way of update, after thinking about this for a week (and getting some > >>> offline feedback), I no longer propose doing this -- at least not for the > >>> short-mid term. I've retargeted this RFE to tbd_major and lowered the > >>> priority to P4. > >>> > >>> Having said that, we don't have any plans to modify SceneBuilder, but > >>> will happily accept contributions. > >>> > >>> -- Kevin > >>> > >>> > >>> Florian Brunner wrote: > >>>> > >>>> OK, this still comes a bit as a surprise as the source code has been > >>>> kept in the repo and was not just provided as a ZIP file. > >>>> > >>>> I'm currently working on a tool based on the SceneBuilder Kit. I needed > >>>> to work on the code a bit and was planning to donate the code back to > >>>> OpenJFX once released, as I was under the impression OpenJFX would serve > >>>> as > >>>> the master / upstream-repo for all SceneBuilder forks. I was also under > >>>> the > >>>> impression that OpenJFX at least would make sure the code works with any > >>>> new > >>>> JDK / JavaFX version and hoped it would get support for new controls, if > >>>> any > >>>> were added to JavaFX. > >>>> > >>>> -Florian > >>>> > >>>> Am Freitag, 2. März 2018, 09:12:15 CET schrieb Kevin Rushforth: > >>>>> > >>>>> I filed the following JBS isuse to remova the SceneBuilder sources from > >>>>> the OpenJFX repo. > >>>>> > >>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198961 > >>>>> > >>>>> As mentioned in the Description of that issue, the OpenJFX repo > >>>>> contains the source code for a no-longer-maintained version of the > >>>>> SceneBuilder tool. Active development on SceneBuilder in the OpenJFX > >>>>> repo > >>>>> was stopped over three years ago. Since that time, the only changes have > >>>>> been either jigsaw-related changes to keep it buildable and runnable, or > >>>>> global changes that happened to touch some of the files in > >>>>> apps/scenebuilder. > >>>>> > >>>>> A fork of SceneBuilder is maintained by Gluon, so anyone wanting to get > >>>>> the latest SceneBuilder should go there. > >>>>> > >>>>> Before I proceed, I wanted to poll the list to see whether anyone has a > >>>>> concern with this. I don't plan to take any action for at least a week. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- Kevin > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >
