Hi Sverre, That is true, we are moving Scene Builder to GitHub. It was a labour intensive process as we looked into PR's and issues and history etc, but it's almost done now.
While the process doesn't change, we understood most developers prefer to work with github for these kinds of open-source projects, so we hope to increase contributions and feedback. We are about to release Scene Builder 10 and then the focus is of course on Scene Builder 11. - Johan On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:12 AM Sverre Moe <sverre....@gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like Gluon has moved SceneBuilder from Bitbucket for GitHub. > https://github.com/gluonhq/scenebuilder > I like this move. GitHub is much better to work with. > > > Den fre. 27. apr. 2018 kl. 13:31 skrev Sverre Moe <sverre....@gmail.com>: > > > > I would like to hear from Gluon about their work on SceneBuilder. > > Do they have any plans for improve on SceneBuilder, both bug fixed and > > new features? > > > > I guess Gluon only work on their own fork of SceneBuilder, but do they > > send changes back to the OpenJFX repository? > > > > We have migrated our application from Swing to JavaFX and have thus > > begun to use SceneBuilder. I therefor hope it will be actively > > maintained further. > > > > How can we the community contribute to the continued development of > > SceneBuilder. > > Should we work against the OpenJFX SceneBuilder or the Gluon > SceneBuilder? > > https://bitbucket.org/gluon-oss/scenebuilder > > > https://github.com/javafxports/openjdk-jfx/tree/develop/apps/scenebuilder > > > > /Sverre > > > > > > 2018-03-13 22:11 GMT+01:00 Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>: > > > That will be a question for Gluon. > > > > > > -- Kevin > > > > > > > > > > > > Michael Paus wrote: > > >> > > >> How will these changes then be synchronized with the work Gluon is > doing > > >> for the version > > >> distributed by them? Do they work on the same repo? > > >> > > >> Am 12.03.18 um 23:25 schrieb Kevin Rushforth: > > >>> > > >>> Hi Florian, > > >>> > > >>> By way of update, after thinking about this for a week (and getting > some > > >>> offline feedback), I no longer propose doing this -- at least not > for the > > >>> short-mid term. I've retargeted this RFE to tbd_major and lowered the > > >>> priority to P4. > > >>> > > >>> Having said that, we don't have any plans to modify SceneBuilder, but > > >>> will happily accept contributions. > > >>> > > >>> -- Kevin > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Florian Brunner wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> OK, this still comes a bit as a surprise as the source code has been > > >>>> kept in the repo and was not just provided as a ZIP file. > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm currently working on a tool based on the SceneBuilder Kit. I > needed > > >>>> to work on the code a bit and was planning to donate the code back > to > > >>>> OpenJFX once released, as I was under the impression OpenJFX would > serve as > > >>>> the master / upstream-repo for all SceneBuilder forks. I was also > under the > > >>>> impression that OpenJFX at least would make sure the code works > with any new > > >>>> JDK / JavaFX version and hoped it would get support for new > controls, if any > > >>>> were added to JavaFX. > > >>>> > > >>>> -Florian > > >>>> > > >>>> Am Freitag, 2. März 2018, 09:12:15 CET schrieb Kevin Rushforth: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I filed the following JBS isuse to remova the SceneBuilder sources > from > > >>>>> the OpenJFX repo. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8198961 > > >>>>> > > >>>>> As mentioned in the Description of that issue, the OpenJFX repo > > >>>>> contains the source code for a no-longer-maintained version of the > > >>>>> SceneBuilder tool. Active development on SceneBuilder in the > OpenJFX repo > > >>>>> was stopped over three years ago. Since that time, the only > changes have > > >>>>> been either jigsaw-related changes to keep it buildable and > runnable, or > > >>>>> global changes that happened to touch some of the files in > > >>>>> apps/scenebuilder. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> A fork of SceneBuilder is maintained by Gluon, so anyone wanting > to get > > >>>>> the latest SceneBuilder should go there. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Before I proceed, I wanted to poll the list to see whether anyone > has a > > >>>>> concern with this. I don't plan to take any action for at least a > week. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- Kevin > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > >
