The new API:
1. `Border.of(Paint stroke)` or `Border.stroke(Paint stroke)` that does
`new Border(new BorderStroke(Paint stroke , BorderStrokeStyle.SOLID, null,
null));`
2. `Background.of((Paint fill)` or `Background.fill(Paint fill)` that does
`new Background(new BackgroundFill(Paint fill, null, null));`
I don't mind either name choice.
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:50 AM Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushfo...@oracle.com>
wrote:
> If I recall, there were a few developers that chimed in. It's a simple
> enough addition -- at least your original proposal (not the suggestion of
> mirroring the Color API, which I don't like) -- that it seems OK to me.
>
> Can you repost your currently proposed API and see if those who might like
> to use it are satisfied with it?
>
> -- Kevin
>
>
> On 6/7/2021 4:41 PM, Nir Lisker wrote:
>
> Does this constitute sufficient interest in the enhancement?
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 6:41 PM Michael Strauß <michaelstr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Another option could be to mirror the `Color` API in both `Border` and
>> `Background`, like in the following examples:
>>
>> Color.rgb(125, 100, 75)
>> Border.rgb(125, 100, 75)
>> Background.rgb(125, 100, 75)
>>
>> Color.gray(127)
>> Border.gray(127)
>> Background.gray(127)
>>
>> Color.web("orange", 0.5)
>> Border.web("orange", 0.5)
>> Background.web("orange", 0.5)
>>
>> We could also mirror the named color constants, which would enable a
>> very compact syntax:
>>
>> StackPane pane = new StackPane();
>> pane.setBorder(Border.RED);
>> pane.setBackground(Background.BLUE);
>>
>> This is very similar to how "red" or "blue" are valid values for
>> "-fx-border" or "-fx-background" in CSS.
>>
>
>
