On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 23:06:05 GMT, Andy Goryachev <ango...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> I am late to the party (should have commented in #675) - "Subscription" is > way too generic and overloaded word for a functional interface. Any one who > is using real Subscriptions will get confused ;-) > > Probably too late to change now. No, you're not too late. The `Subscription` class is already part of JFX 19, but it is not public. Subscription was the term using in ReactFX and similar frameworks, and was quite clear, but if you have a suggestion for a name that is even better suited than it can still be changed. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/830
