On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 09:10:34 GMT, John Hendrikx <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I didn't look too far for alternative names after I discovered `showing`
>> would not be possible. The name comes from `isTreeShowing` which is used
>> for a similar purpose (inside `Node`) and from `conditionOnShowing` in
>> ReactFX.
>>
>> The name needs to imply that visibility has no effect on it (ie,
>> `setVisible(false)` won't toggle it). Neither does it check if the node
>> isn't covered or off screen.
>>
>> In theory you could use a more general name (like `active` as in "part of an
>> active currently showing scene graph"). `isActive` seems to even be
>> available...
>>
>> A name like "used" or "inUse" may also work (as in "indicates the node is
>> currently used as part of a currently showing scene graph".
>
> That reminds me... `parent` is described as:
>
>> The parent of this {@code Node}. If this {@code Node} has not been added to
>> a scene graph, then parent will be null.
>
> Which I think is incorrect; parent can easily be non-null while not being
> part of a scene graph.
`displayed`/`displaying`?
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/830
