On Tue, 8 Aug 2023 23:44:58 GMT, Jose Pereda <jper...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> So far, BorderPane does the calculation for the children min/pref 
>> width/height taken into account only the margin applied to them, if any, but 
>> not the total padding that could be applied as well to the BorderPane itself.
>> 
>> However, this padding needs to be taken into account as well, and this PR 
>> modifies BorderPane to subtract its insets from its size while doing the 
>> children min/pref width/height calculations.
>> 
>> A parameterized test has been included. 
>> 
>> It is a simplified version of the test case attached to 
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8313709, but still shows how without 
>> this patch, two of the cases (padding with or without margin) fail, while 
>> pass with it.
>
> Jose Pereda has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Migrate old tests to JUnit 5

modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/layout/BorderPane.java line 
395:

> 393: 
> 394:             double middleAreaHeight = Math.max(0,
> 395:                     height - insets.getTop() - insets.getBottom() - 
> topPrefHeight - bottomPrefHeight);

should these be snapped?  snappedBottomInset() etc.?

modules/javafx.graphics/src/main/java/javafx/scene/layout/BorderPane.java line 
415:

> 413:         if (width != -1) {
> 414:             width -= (insets.getLeft() + insets.getRight());
> 415:         }

ditto here

modules/javafx.graphics/src/test/java/test/javafx/scene/layout/BorderPaneTest.java
 line 938:

> 936:     @ParameterizedTest
> 937:     public void testFlowPaneCenterChildWithPaddingAndMargin(double 
> width, double minHeight, boolean useMargin, boolean usePadding) {
> 938:         FlowPane center = new FlowPane(10, 10);

I wonder if we should also test the layout-related code using fractional scale 
+ snapping.
what do you think?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1203#discussion_r1296446580
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1203#discussion_r1296447169
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1203#discussion_r1296450320

Reply via email to