On Tue, 7 May 2024 06:11:59 GMT, drmarmac <d...@openjdk.org> wrote: >> That one should work everywhere, since it is equivalent. Worth >> double-checking, though. > > Updated. I checked this variant with IntelliJ: While I can follow the link, > it doesn't show the wrapAround field's javadoc, just the wrapAroundProperty's > javadoc which is empty.
I guess that's because IntelliJ doesn't process the javafx properties. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1450#discussion_r1592684421
