On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:27:03 GMT, Andy Goryachev <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Sure, but we're here now, why come back to it later? As you point out, the >> code has been like that for 10 years, so there's no need for a "quick" fix. > > @mstr2 we could address this investigation in a follow-up. Yes, but why not do the review and testing? We don't need to rush this change in, as there's no observable defect that's being fixed with this PR. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2037#discussion_r2694850440
