On Sun, 16 Aug 2026 09:42:15 GMT, Michael Strauß <[email protected]> wrote:
>> My thought was to explain why this method exists. Do you have a suggestion, >> or should we just remove it entirely? > > I don't think that accessor methods should contain specification (that should > probably live on the actual implementation), but you decide if you want to > keep it. will remove. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/2191#discussion_r3945774662
