I think it is important to have a separate maxent release -- there are many people who use that package without using the OpenNLP toolkit.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Jörn Kottmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Historically all three parts have been released independent > of each other. The Maxent version and OpenNLP version > do not match. > > In my opinion we should release everything together and ship > it in one package in the future. The Tools and Uima version is > already aligned, after the big maxent refactoring the maxent version > can also be aligned. > > Our first release at Apache could be one package, which contains > all three artifacts in these versions: > OpenNLP Tools 1.5.1 > OpenNLP UIMA 1.5.1 > OpenNLP Maxent 3.0.1 > > Jörn > > > On 12/3/10 1:35 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> James, >> >> It all depends on your proposed release architecture. Every releasable >> thing, in my opinion, gets its own TTB. >> >> That's the idea of the /products dir in the proposal I sent. >> >> --benson >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:13 PM, James Kosin<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hmmm... >>> >>> Maybe this would be better: >>> >>> /opennlp >>> /tools >>> /tags >>> /branches >>> /trunk >>> /uima >>> /tags >>> /branches >>> /trunk >>> /maxent >>> /tags >>> /branches >>> /trunk >>> >>> I know it looks odd, but, when we decide to move maxent on to the other >>> project, It won't be as destructive and allows us to keep the three a >>> bit separated. >>> What is Apache's requirement on releases? Do they have to be a single >>> tar? Or can it be several independent library modules? >>> >>> This way we can still have: >>> opennlp-maxent-incubator-....... >>> opennlp-uima-incubator-...... >>> opennlp-tools-incubator-...... >>> >>> James >>> >>> > -- Jason Baldridge Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics The University of Texas at Austin http://comp.ling.utexas.edu/people/jason_baldridge
