On 12/3/2010 02:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
Mine was a typo.
You can always decide to release three things together. But if you
lump them under one ttb, it's a pain to release them separately. So
Why?
you *might*, and I really wish to defer to you guys, want to split
them up upon import.
What I really care about, however, is a structure where it is not too
painful to change your/our minds later. So long as the overall tree
has the extra level to allow for multiple TTB structures, it doesn't
so much matter if you start with 1 or 4.
I don't buy into that argument. I see no problem with
trunk
proj1
proj2
proj3
branch
proj1
proj1branch1
...
proj2
tags
proj1
To my mind, it's totally a matter of taste. And I like
this better ;-) My main reason would be that it provides
a central trunk (which is what most everybody needs most
of the time). You can just check out everything with
svn co http://..../trunk opennlp, cd into opennlp and
build. You don't have to go to 3 different places to
get maxent, the toolkit and the UIMA wrappers.
BTW, we have the kind of setup that Benson suggests in
UIMA, and I find it annoying. So I speak from experience.
Of course, as I say above, it's pretty much a matter of
taste, and I'll go with the majority.
--Thilo
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Jörn Kottmann<[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/3/10 2:20 AM, James Kosin wrote:
Thanks,
Benson, that should be a /tags directory. /tag wouldn't work....
Other than that it looks good.
James
/tag actual does work, since its really only a convention
(its usually a best practice to follow the convention).
Its even possible to use subversion without trunk, tags
and branch. Like we might do with the site folder.
Jörn
