On Oct 24, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Alex Bennee wrote: > As these could be arbitary these should probably be stored in a new db > table, something like nodeid, oid, value. > > These values should be displayed in the SNMP attributes box as > Name/Value pairs with the name coming from a config that specifies > what > static SNMP values should be collected for what types of hardware. > > Does this make sense/seem a good idea to people? Or is this a special > case of normal SNMP data collection?
I know that David has some ideas about making all of our "agent" based collections and configuration much more generic. When OpenNMS was started we only talked to SNMP agents, but now there are quite a few others. Perhaps some of these ideas can be implemented into that new design. -T _______________________________________________________________________ Tarus Balog, OpenNMS Maintainer Main: +1 919 533 0160 The OpenNMS Group, Inc. Fax: +1 503 961 7746 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.opennms.org PGP Key Fingerprint: 8945 8521 9771 FEC9 5481 512B FECA 11D2 FD82 B45C ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
