On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 03:45 -0400, Tarus Balog wrote: > On Oct 24, 2008, at 2:03 PM, Alex Bennee wrote: > > > As these could be arbitary these should probably be stored in a new db > > table, something like nodeid, oid, value. > > > > These values should be displayed in the SNMP attributes box as > > Name/Value pairs with the name coming from a config that specifies > > what > > static SNMP values should be collected for what types of hardware. > > > > Does this make sense/seem a good idea to people? Or is this a special > > case of normal SNMP data collection? > > I know that David has some ideas about making all of our "agent" based > collections and configuration much more generic. When OpenNMS was > started we only talked to SNMP agents, but now there are quite a few > others. Perhaps some of these ideas can be implemented into that new > design.
Are there any notes or design ideas written down anywhere? David? -- Alex Bennee, Software Engineer That's one small step for a man; one giant leap for mankind. -- Neil Armstrong ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
