On 7/8/13 12:31 PM, Tarus Balog wrote: > I really don't see a problem with it from the OpenNMS side, but I wanted > to solicit feedback to see if anyone had a reasonable objection for > changing the license.
+1 I'm for it. Apache license is perfect for this kind of stuff. It's library code, it's meant to be shared as widely as possible. -- Benjamin Reed The OpenNMS Group http://www.opennms.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
