On 07/08/2013 01:21 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote: >> I really don't see a problem with it from the OpenNMS side, but I wanted >> to solicit feedback to see if anyone had a reasonable objection for >> changing the license. > > +1 I'm for it. Apache license is perfect for this kind of stuff. It's > library code, it's meant to be shared as widely as possible.
+1 Couldn't have said it better. -jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Please read the OpenNMS Mailing List FAQ: http://www.opennms.org/index.php/Mailing_List_FAQ opennms-devel mailing list To *unsubscribe* or change your subscription options, see the bottom of this page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opennms-devel
