On Apr 30, 2014, at 11:27 PM, Duane Ellis <[email protected]> wrote:

> duane>>       In the “TAP” structure - add a “DAP” pointer
> 
> andreas> No, target->tap is JTAG specific. An SWD only setup should not need 
> to have a tap pointer. 
> 
> That’s a problem - Please thing about a solution.
> 
> BTW - also need a solution for  a JTAG tap that is accessed via the  DAP -> 
> JTAG_AP interface..
> 
> ie:   Openodd  -> interface ->  SWD mode -> DAP -> JTAG_AP
> 
> -Duane.
> 
> 


Andreas 

Perhaps you are on vacation, or a holiday and having a good time :-)  I have 
not seen a reply

Do you have a suggestion? Or can you please present an alliterative way to 
resolve this?

I think we all understand the current problem - “multiple dap structures” - 
they should be only one.

In summary, these are the issues:

    One DAP - with more then 1 CortexM3 present.
    That DAP with a Cortex_A type processor (several)
     That DAP with other processors via the JTAG_AP port.

And - there can be more then 1 DAP if the target uses SWD2 (multi-drop SWD mode)

I don’t want to create a solution that will be rejected, it’s sort of a waste 
of time.

Thanks.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.  Get 
unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available.
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel

Reply via email to