On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Duane Ellis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Duane> Bottom line: Are you ok with putting the DAP structure in the TAP
> structure as the first step?
>
> andreas> No, I'm not even OK with the DAP *pointer* that's currently there.
>
> Hmm - I must have been blind - I did not see that.
>
> what if I did this: use exactly that existing DAP structure pointer and
> remove the DAP STRUCTS from all other places. For example the Cortex_M has
> both a POINTER and a STRUCT, the STRUCT would go away.
>
>
The tap structure is still not a good place to have it. There are better
places. Look at http://openocd.zylin.com/2137 where I just pushed some
proof-of-concept code (i.e. at least it compiles) to show what I'm after.
/Andreas
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
• Requirements for releasing software faster
• Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
OpenOCD-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
