On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 09:13:37PM -0700, Ram Bhamidipaty wrote: > My impression is that the Windows build with Cygwin was a bit hard to > duplicate. A while back (maybe 2 years) there were discussions on the > list about the exact set of packages that were needed to build OpenOCD. > It seemed (at that time) that creating a reproducible windows build > environment was not so simple. Perhaps MinGW is easier?
Should be rather easy now, both with Cygwin (+MinGW-w64 toolchain) and MSYS+MinGW-w64. Please see the README and README.Windows for details. > If that is no longer true - then there would be no need for this. And it > may not matter since the C99 issue would be too much work. Right. Please report if you find any issues with the current procedure. -- Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software! mailto:[email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech _______________________________________________ OpenOCD-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openocd-devel
