Does either rev 1833 or 1833 with my patch displaying something like this in 
the beginning?

Info : J-Link compiled Feb 20 2006 18:20:20 -- Update --
Info : JLink caps 0x3
Info : JLink max mem block 32
Info : Vref = 3.283 TCK = 1 TDI = 0 TDO = 1 TMS = 0 SRST = 1 TRST = 255


The problem is that my old JLink uses a different USB endpoint, so if one 
version succedes this simple output message, the other WILL fail because it is 
sending to a channel where the jlink doesn't answer at all

I only have access to a stm32 and an at91sam7s64 board

./src/openocd -f ./src/target/interface/jlink.cfg -f 
./src/target/target/stm32.cfg
That's how i call oocd atm...

With my patch I only get one Error: J-Link command EMU_CMD_VERSION failed 
(-110) error in the beginning and every other 2 or 3 times it doesn't detect 
the jlink at all, but if the JLink info message appeares, there's no more 
errors...

Benjamin


On Tuesday 19 May 2009 12:36:24 am Gene Smith wrote:
> Benjamin Schmidt wrote:
> > There's this segger closed source linux gdm server tool...
> >
> > http://www.segger.com/pub/jlink/JLink_Linux_090202.tar.gz
> >
> >
> >
> > It can show the hardware version.
>
> With patch still gets three EMU_CMD_GET_CAPS errors and "don't worry".
> Then LED goes off on jlink. Should it go off? Not sure how I know that
> it is definitely working or not working. "Reset halt" command fails
> "usb_bulk_read failed ...". "flash info 0" seems to work.
> Will try the link above in morning.
> What command line do you use to start openocd with jlink and str712
> board? Thanks for any pointers you can provide!
> -gene
>
> > On Monday 18 May 2009 11:24:51 pm Gene Smith wrote:
> >> Benjamin Schmidt wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I posted a similar patch several month ago.
> >>> I have a JLink version v3.0
> >>>
> >>> To get it to work you have to change several little things.
> >>>
> >>> This is just a very ugly hack that somewhat disables support for >=V5
> >>> JLinks
> >>>
> >>> I'd just be interested if any of you can also get it to work this
> >>> way... I would like to build a clean version of this patch that
> >>> doesen't break the rest of the system, but I'd need some more help as
> >>> I'm not experienced in any openocd/jtag code
> >>>
> >>> If you're interested I can explaine all the things that I needed to
> >>> change...
> >>
> >> I will let you know if it works before you explain it.
> >>
> >>> Benjamin Schmidt
> >>
> >> Thanks! I have no idea what "version" jlink I have (yellow, marked
> >> j-link ks/IAR systems on front, j-link-arm-ks on back. Where do you find
> >> the version? Inside?
> >>
> >> I see your patch is against 1833 (head) which I now have so will give it
> >> a try. Thanks again!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openocd-development mailing list
> Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to