On Thursday 28 January 2010, Matthew Fletcher wrote: > There appears to be a certain amount of rot in the amt_jtagaccel driver,
That was my conclusion when I noticed, not long ago, that it wouldn't even *build* with PPDEV enabled ... an issue that's been around for quite some time. Those unexpected IDCODE message, like > Warn : Unexpected idcode after end of chain: 320 0x8000007f are frequently caused by clocking problems. The correct values would be 0x000000ff ... a one-bit shift of what is actually reported. That's not necessarily the same issue as the > Error: Translation from khz to jtag_speed not implemented thing, but the problems could be related. - Dave _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development