On Wed, Jul 20, 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:

> > No, I never miss any commit. I just don't comment everything in public ;-)
> > See my personal mail to you in your [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailbox...
>
> Did you receive my mail where i told you that the openpkg.net mailserver
> seems to be down ?

Ops! No. Yes, the Postfix seemed to be down. Now fixed. Sorry for
the inconvenience.

> [...]
> > > Apart from this i thank you for your comments. I did not see other
> > > critical changes. Add the odoc stuff and commit it. I'm going to check,
> > > whether it works for me.
> >
> > I can't add it because as far as I see it, just using %{l_odoc} doesn't
> > work. And the "bacula" package can be used without this, so I recommend
> > to leave "odoc" out from "bacula" for now until all issues with "odoc"
> > are resolved. Ok?
>
> I don't know, what you mean with "%{l_odoc}" does not work ? It worked
> for me, else i could not have built the package. It's just that the odoc
> package is needed.

Well, who actually _DEFINES_ the l_odoc macro and where does
it define it? Oh, I now see it: you are directly patching the
<prefix>/etc/openpkg/rpmmacros file of "openpkg" yourself. Puhh... well,
ok, at least it works this way, of course.

                                       Ralf S. Engelschall
                                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                       www.engelschall.com

______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project                                    www.openpkg.org
Developer Communication List                   openpkg-dev@openpkg.org

Reply via email to