On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:03:09AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote:
>
> > [..]
> > One could special case the openpkg package, but I'd like to avoid this
> > if possible.
> >
> > The following patch therefore will simply select the database entry with
> > the smallest version number, i.e. OpenPKG-2.1.0-2.1.0 when deciding on
> > wether it needs an update.
> > [...]
>
> I've tested this patch. Now it works as expected for a RELEASE based
> OpenPKG instances, but on a CURRENT based OpenPKG instance (really all
> packages from CURRENT, no mix), it now tries there to always rebuild and
> upgrade an already up-to-date "openpkg" CURRENT package. I think we have
> to afford a special case here, haven't we?
Thanks to your last change it doesn't happen anymore :)
| revision 1.349
| date: 2004-07-24 22:10:41 +0000; author: rse; state: Exp; lines: +1 -2
| remove useless "Provides" for the corresponding RELEASE version
Greetings,
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
