On Sun, Jul 25, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:03:09AM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 24, 2004, Michael van Elst wrote:
> >
> > > [..]
> > > One could special case the openpkg package, but I'd like to avoid this
> > > if possible.
> > >
> > > The following patch therefore will simply select the database entry with
> > > the smallest version number, i.e. OpenPKG-2.1.0-2.1.0 when deciding on
> > > wether it needs an update.
> > > [...]
> >
> > I've tested this patch. Now it works as expected for a RELEASE based
> > OpenPKG instances, but on a CURRENT based OpenPKG instance (really all
> > packages from CURRENT, no mix), it now tries there to always rebuild and
> > upgrade an already up-to-date "openpkg" CURRENT package. I think we have
> > to afford a special case here, haven't we?
>
> Thanks to your last change it doesn't happen anymore :)
>
> | revision 1.349
> | date: 2004-07-24 22:10:41 +0000; author: rse; state: Exp; lines: +1 -2
> | remove useless "Provides" for the corresponding RELEASE version
<grin> This was my hope yesterday evening, too. Cool.
Then I'll release openpkg-tool with your patch. Thanks.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
The OpenPKG Project www.openpkg.org
User Communication List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
