Well, I went to look at the cvs for emacs and I found the following link
with the notable excerpt:

http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/emacs/emacs/etc/MACHINES?revision=1.24&view=markup

---BEGIN---
X86_64 GNU/Linux

  No special procedures should be needed to build a 64-bit Emacs.  To
  build a 32-bit Emacs, first ensure that the necessary 32-bit system
  libraries and include files are installed.  Then use:

    env CC="gcc -m32" ./configure --build=i386-linux-gnu \
      --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib

  (using the location of the 32-bit X libraries on your system).
---END---

It seems to me that this would just build a 32-bit version of emacs on a
64-bit system, which is probably fine.  If this is the case then it
could just be a slight modification of the spec file based on a platform
case statement.  If somebody else doesn't get to trying this out before
me, then I'll likely test this out in the near future.

On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:54 -0700, Doug Summers wrote:
> David M. Fetter wrote:
> > Is there any word on this problem?  I just tried to build emacs again
> > from current on the RHEL4 64-bit but it still wasn't recognizing the
> > architecture.
> > 
> > + ./configure --cache-file=./config.cache --prefix=/usr/local --with-x
> > --x-includes=/usr/X11R6/include --x-libraries=/usr/X11R6/lib64
> > --without-toolkit-scroll-bars --with-jpeg --with-png --with-tiff
> > --with-gif --with-x-toolkit=athena
> > loading cache ./config.cache
> > checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
> > configure: error: Emacs hasn't been ported to `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
> > systems.
> > Check `etc/MACHINES' for recognized configuration names.
> > 
> > 
> > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 11:19 -0700, David M. Fetter wrote:
> >> It seems that this is still a problem, at least it is for us on RHEL4
> >> 64-bit.  We have partially looked into this and found that it might be
> >> able to be fixed with the newer release or maybe by doing some hacking
> >> with shtool or whatnot to add in the new architectures to it's
> >> detection.  I would think that just MFC'ing the newer version into the
> >> 2-Stable would be easiest though.  Could this be done?
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 13:33 -0700, Doug Summers wrote:
> >>> Bill Campbell wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2006, Doug Summers wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I can't build emacs from any version available. It keeps complaining
> >>>>>> about the host type not being supported. I noticed that the code is
> >>>>>> fairly old - is there a newer version available?
> >>>>> Which particular Emacs version on which AMD64-based OS have you tried?
> >>>> I just tried this on SuSE Linux Enterprise 9 with an Athlon 64,
> >>>> building emacs-21.4a-2.5.0.src.rpm.
> >>>>
> >>>> The problem appears that the configure script at line 1643 recognizes
> >>>> amd64*-*-*, and at line 1635 recognizes ia64*-*-* while the host system
> >>>> type comes up with x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> >>>>
> >>>> It appears that some hacking is necessary on the configure file
> >>>> to get the right combination.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm up to my a$$ in alligators now so don't have time to hack on
> >>>> this (and I'm a vi bigot not emacs :-).
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill
> >>>> --
> >>>> INTERNET:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
> >>>> URL: http://www.celestial.com/  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
> >>>> FAX:            (206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 
> >>>> 236-1676
> >>>>
> >>>> The Constitution is a written instrument.  As such, its meaning
> >>>> does not alter.  That which it meant when it was adopted, it
> >>>> means now.
> >>>> -- SOUTH CAROLINA v. US, 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905)
> >>>> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>>> The OpenPKG Project                                    www.openpkg.org
> >>>> User Communication List                      openpkg-users@openpkg.org
> >>> Supposedly the more recent CVS versions of Emacs fix this problem, but I 
> >>> haven't tested it yet.
> >>>
> >>> Ralph - I'll give this a try later on tonight and let you know if it 
> >>> works and what version.
> >>>
> >>> Doug
> >>> ______________________________________________________________________
> If I can get the source RPM that RedHat uses I can look at the .spec and 
> see how they define 64-bit machines.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenPKG                                             http://openpkg.org
> User Communication List                      openpkg-users@openpkg.org
> 
-- 
David M. Fetter - UNIX Systems Administrator
Portland State University - www.oit.pdx.edu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to