On Tue, Feb 17, 2009, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Am Montag, 16. Februar 2009 20:02:35 schrieb Ralf S. Engelschall: > > Yes, the new RPM 5 based bootstrap is already based on GNU Tar 1.21 and > > hence built just fine for me last week on a new Debian 5.0 box. This > > boostrap will be made available to the public soon, too. Just be patient > > a little bit more. > > I saw that you are deeply involved with rpm5(.org). > On rpm.org and rpm5.org I could not find statements on the relation of both > efforts and why rpm5 would be better than rpm4 in the long run. > > Do you know such a document comparing the approaches? (Best would be from a > neutral point of view, but having the view of both groups would be > interesting as well)?
Some time ago I wrote a little bit on this topic: http://trainofthoughts.org/blog/2008/01/06/rpm5-vs-rpm/ Ralf S. Engelschall r...@engelschall.com www.engelschall.com ______________________________________________________________________ OpenPKG http://openpkg.org User Communication List openpkg-users@openpkg.org
