I have enabled the following line in immd.conf: export IMMSV_SC_ABSENCE_ALLOWED=900
Thanks -Nagu > -----Original Message----- > From: Nagendra Kumar > Sent: 03 February 2016 17:34 > To: Vu Minh Nguyen; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for log: add support for > cloud resilience feature [#1179] > > Hi Vu, > I was testing this Amf patch along with other "Cluster Resilience" > patches, I am finding difficulties in making Log service coming up. Can you > please check the problem with this patch(if any). > > Attached is the Log sv trace and below is the syslog: > > > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmloadd: NO Load starting Feb 3 17:31:13 > PM_SC-1 osafimmloadd: NO ***** Loading from XML file imm.xml at > /etc/opensaf ***** Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmloadd: NO The class > OpensafImm has been created since it was missing from the imm.xml load > file Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmloadd: IN Class OsafImmPbeRt created > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmloadd: NO The class OsafImmPbeRt has > been created since it was missing from the imm.xml load file Feb 3 17:31:13 > PM_SC-1 osafimmloadd: NO The > opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService object of class > OpensafImm has been created since it was missing from the imm.xml load > file Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO Ccb 1 COMMITTED > (IMMLOADER) Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO Closing > admin owner IMMLOADER id(1), loading of IMM done Feb 3 17:31:13 > PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO NODE STATE-> > IMM_NODE_FULLY_AVAILABLE 2712 Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 > osafimmnd[18311]: NO RepositoryInitModeT is SA_IMM_INIT_FROM_FILE > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: WA IMM Access Control mode > is DISABLED! > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO opensafImmNostdFlags > changed to: 0xf6 Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO Epoch set > to 2 in ImmModel Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmd[18299]: NO ACT: New > Epoch for IMMND process at node 2010f old epoch: 1 new epoch:2 Feb 3 > 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmd[18299]: NO Ruling epoch changed to:2 Feb 3 > 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmd[18299]: NO Attached Nodes:1 Accepted > nodes:1 KnownVeteran:0 doReply:0 Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmloadd: > NO Load ending normally Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO > SERVER STATE: IMM_SERVER_LOADING_SERVER --> IMM_SERVER_READY > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO ABT ImmModel received > scAbsenceAllowed 900 Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18324]: Started > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18324]: NO LOGSV_DATA_GROUPNAME > not found Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18324]: NO LOG root directory > is: "/var/log/opensaf/saflog" > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18324]: NO LOG data group is: "" > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18324]: NO LGS_MBCSV_VERSION = 5 Feb > 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO Implementer connected: 1 > (safLogService) <2, 2010f> Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO > implementer for class 'OpenSafLogConfig' is safLogService => class extent is > safe. > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO implementer for class > 'SaLogStreamConfig' is safLogService => class extent is safe. > Feb 3 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO Implementer locally > disconnected. Marking it as doomed 1 <2, 2010f> (safLogService) Feb 3 > 17:31:13 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO Implementer disconnected 1 <2, > 2010f> (safLogService) Feb 3 17:31:53 PM_SC-1 opensafd[18248]: ER Timed- > out for response from LOGD Feb 3 17:31:53 PM_SC-1 opensafd[18248]: ER > Feb 3 17:31:53 PM_SC-1 opensafd[18248]: ER Going for recovery Feb 3 > 17:31:53 PM_SC-1 opensafd[18248]: ER Trying To RESPAWN > /usr/local/lib/opensaf/clc-cli/osaf-logd attempt #1 Feb 3 17:31:53 PM_SC-1 > opensafd[18248]: ER Sending SIGABRT to LOGD, pid=18324, (origin parent > pid=18319) Feb 3 17:31:53 PM_SC-1 opensafd[18248]: ER Sending SIGKILL to > LOGD, pid=18319 Feb 3 17:32:08 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18359]: Started Feb 3 > 17:32:08 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18359]: NO LOGSV_DATA_GROUPNAME not > found Feb 3 17:32:08 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18359]: NO LOG root directory is: > "/var/log/opensaf/saflog" > Feb 3 17:32:08 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18359]: NO LOG data group is: "" > Feb 3 17:32:08 PM_SC-1 osaflogd[18359]: NO LGS_MBCSV_VERSION = 5 Feb > 3 17:32:08 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO Implementer connected: 2 > (safLogService) <14, 2010f> Feb 3 17:32:08 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO > Implementer locally disconnected. Marking it as doomed 2 <14, 2010f> > (safLogService) Feb 3 17:32:08 PM_SC-1 osafimmnd[18311]: NO > Implementer disconnected 2 <14, 2010f> (safLogService) > > Thanks > -Nagu > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 28 January 2016 10:11 > > To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Mathivanan > > Naickan Palanivelu > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for log: add > > support for cloud resilience feature [#1179] > > > > Hi, > > > > I forgot adding information. To build the #1179 patch successfully, > > need > > #777 pushed. > > > > Regards, Vu. > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Vu Minh Nguyen [mailto:[email protected]] > > >Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 11:13 AM > > >To: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > >[email protected] > > >Cc: [email protected] > > >Subject: [devel] [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for log: add support > > >for > > cloud > > >resilience feature [#1179] > > > > > >Summary: log: add support for cloud resilience feature [#1179] Review > > >request for Trac Ticket(s): #1179 Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Anders, > > >Mathi Pull request to: Lennart Affected branch(es): Default > > >Development > > >branch: Default > > > > > >-------------------------------- > > >Impacted area Impact y/n > > >-------------------------------- > > > Docs n > > > Build system n > > > RPM/packaging n > > > Configuration files n > > > Startup scripts n > > > SAF services y > > > OpenSAF services n > > > Core libraries n > > > Samples n > > > Tests n > > > Other n > > > > > > > > >Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): > > >--------------------------------------------- > > > <<EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE>> > > > > > >changeset 90a6bd73b83a52d561572d171a7042ac319511cb > > >Author: Lennart Lund <[email protected]> > > >Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 12:20:27 +0700 > > > > > > log: add support for cloud resilience feature [#1179] > > > > > > The patch makes LOG service be able to handle the case that both SC > > >nodes > > > are down at the same time. When one or both nodes go up again the > > log > > > service must be able to resume its work preferably without actions > > by > > >the > > > clients. > > > > > > A log client should not have to be aware of if one or both SC nodes > > are > > > down. The only thing that should happen is that a TRY AGAIN (and in > > >some > > > cases TIMEOUT) returned. It is the responsibility of the client to > > decide > > > how to handle this. > > > > > > > > >Added Files: > > >------------ > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga_state.c > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga_state.h > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_recov.cc > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_recov.h > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/README-HEADLESS > > > tests/logsv/tet_Log_recov.c > > > > > > > > >Complete diffstat: > > >------------------ > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/Makefile.am | 6 +- > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga.h | 53 +++- > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga_api.c | 858 > > >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga_mds.c | 46 ++- > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga_state.c | 670 > > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga_state.h | 41 ++ > > > osaf/libs/agents/saf/lga/lga_util.c | 94 +++++- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/README | 2 - > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/README-HEADLESS | 230 ++++++++++++++ > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/Makefile.am | 6 +- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs.h | 12 + > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_cb.h | 14 + > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_evt.cc | 66 +++- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_evt.h | 5 + > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_file.cc | 5 + > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_file.h | 1 + > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_filehdl.cc | 423 > > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_filehdl.h | 21 + > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.cc | 541 > > >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_main.cc | 134 +++++++- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_mbcsv.cc | 22 +- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_recov.cc | 748 > > >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_recov.h | 37 ++ > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.cc | 99 ++++- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_stream.h | 30 +- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_util.cc | 50 ++- > > > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_util.h | 4 + > > > tests/logsv/Makefile.am | 1 + > > > tests/logsv/README | 4 + > > > tests/logsv/logtest.c | 290 ++++++++++++++++- > > > tests/logsv/logtest.h | 57 +++ > > > tests/logsv/logtestfr.c | 6 +- > > > tests/logsv/saflogtest.c | 46 ++- > > > tests/logsv/tet_Log_misc.c | 24 +- > > > tests/logsv/tet_Log_recov.c | 1837 > > > >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > +++++ > > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 35 files changed, 6069 insertions(+), 414 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > >Testing Commands: > > >----------------- > > > Test suite #9 and #10 are added to test this feature, but needs to > > >have IMM (#1625) and AMF (#1620) pushed. > > > > > > For now, to test it, can hard code "lgs_cb.scAbsenceAllowed = 1", to > > > make logsv enter headless mode, then run all test suites. > > > > > > > > >Testing, Expected Results: > > >-------------------------- > > > All tests PASS > > > > > > > > >Conditions of Submission: > > >------------------------- > > > Get ack from reviewers. Hope getting them within 03 weeks. > > > > > > > > >Arch Built Started Linux distro > > >------------------------------------------- > > >mips n n > > >mips64 n n > > >x86 n n > > >x86_64 n n > > >powerpc n n > > >powerpc64 n n > > > > > > > > >Reviewer Checklist: > > >------------------- > > >[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any > > >checkmarks!] > > > > > > > > >Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): > > > > > >___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank > entries > > > that need proper data filled in. > > > > > >___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. > > > > > >___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header > > > > > >___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. > > > > > >___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your > > headers/comments/text. > > > > > >___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. > > > > > >___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files > > > (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) > > > > > >___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. > > > Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. > > > > > >___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be > removed. > > > > > >___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes > > > like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. > > > > > >___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other > > > cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. > > > > > >___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is > > > too much content into a single commit. > > > > > >___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) > > > > > >___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; > > > Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. > > > > > >___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as > threaded > > > commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. > > > > > >___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication > > > of what has changed between each re-send. > > > > > >___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the > > > comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial > review. > > > > > >___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) > > > > > >___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the > > > the threaded patch review. > > > > > >___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any > results > > > for in-service upgradability test. > > > > > >___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch > series > > > do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >-- > > >---- > > --- > > >Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application > > >Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just > > >$35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective > > >actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. > Signup Now! > > >http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 > > >_______________________________________________ > > >Opensaf-devel mailing list > > >[email protected] > > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------- > > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensaf-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
