Hi Guys,
I realized I forgot to put some notes in this review request...
75% of this code is from Praveen. I added some stuff that wasn't
there like shutting down contained sus when the container goes down,
allowing TRY_AGAIN in contained instantiation, and some more
configuration checking.
Everything in the B.04.01 spec regarding container/contained should
be implemented, but I have not testing everything. Everything in the
samples/amf/container directory has been tested (container n-way,
contained 2-n, TRY_AGAIN for contained instantiation), but I have not
tested other service models for the contained SG. I have also tested
locking the container SUs, and the container SG, to make sure the
contained SUs go down.
Let me know if you see problems, or think something wasn't done
right.
Alex
On 07/31/2018 04:22 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
Summary: amf: add support for container/contained [#70]
Review request for Ticket(s): 70
Peer Reviewer(s): Nagu, Hans, Ravi, Gary
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-70
Base revision: 7f6f6c0531a0f5e4f2b0dc1abf4bab6962a3d1a9
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/trguitar/review
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services y
OpenSAF services n
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other n
NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
revision d33e50eeb51ccf8808c24a445637d6f1472c396e
Author: Alex Jones [1]<ajo...@rbbn.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 16:06:47 -0400
amf: add support for container/contained [#70]
This ticket adds support for container/contained for AMF.
Added Files:
------------
samples/amf/container/amf_container_demo.c
samples/amf/container/amf_container_script
samples/amf/container/AppConfig-contained-2N.xml
samples/amf/container/AppConfig-container.xml
samples/amf/container/Makefile.am
samples/amf/container/README
Complete diffstat:
------------------
samples/amf/container/AppConfig-contained-2N.xml | 327 +++++++++
samples/amf/container/AppConfig-container.xml | 331 ++++++++++
samples/amf/container/Makefile.am | 45 ++
samples/amf/container/README | 36 +
samples/amf/container/amf_container_demo.c | 803 +++++++++++++++++++++++
samples/amf/container/amf_container_script | 101 +++
src/amf/agent/amf_agent.cc | 73 ++-
src/amf/agent/ava_cb.h | 1 +
src/amf/agent/ava_hdl.cc | 31 +
src/amf/agent/ava_mds.cc | 34 +-
src/amf/agent/ava_mds.h | 3 +-
src/amf/agent/ava_op.cc | 6 +
src/amf/amfd/comp.cc | 55 +-
src/amf/amfd/comp.h | 4 +-
src/amf/amfd/comptype.cc | 6 +-
src/amf/amfd/csi.cc | 6 +
src/amf/amfd/csi.h | 3 +
src/amf/amfd/ndproc.cc | 14 +
src/amf/amfd/node.cc | 29 +
src/amf/amfd/node.h | 1 +
src/amf/amfd/sg.cc | 29 +
src/amf/amfd/sg.h | 4 +
src/amf/amfd/sgproc.cc | 142 +++-
src/amf/amfd/si.cc | 17 +
src/amf/amfd/si.h | 1 +
src/amf/amfd/su.cc | 155 ++++-
src/amf/amfd/su.h | 15 +-
src/amf/amfd/util.cc | 39 ++
src/amf/amfd/util.h | 2 +
src/amf/amfnd/amfnd.cc | 5 +-
src/amf/amfnd/avnd_cb.h | 2 +
src/amf/amfnd/avnd_comp.h | 64 +-
src/amf/amfnd/avnd_evt.h | 1 +
src/amf/amfnd/avnd_proc.h | 2 +
src/amf/amfnd/avnd_su.h | 4 +
src/amf/amfnd/cbq.cc | 102 ++-
src/amf/amfnd/chc.cc | 2 +-
src/amf/amfnd/clc.cc | 95 ++-
src/amf/amfnd/comp.cc | 90 ++-
src/amf/amfnd/compdb.cc | 22 +-
src/amf/amfnd/err.cc | 2 +-
src/amf/amfnd/evt.cc | 2 +
src/amf/amfnd/main.cc | 1 +
src/amf/amfnd/mds.cc | 19 +
src/amf/amfnd/proxy.cc | 2 +-
src/amf/amfnd/su.cc | 8 +
src/amf/amfnd/susm.cc | 88 ++-
src/amf/common/amf_amfparam.h | 22 +
src/amf/common/amf_d2nmsg.h | 10 +
src/amf/common/amf_defs.h | 2 +
src/amf/common/amf_util.h | 3 +-
src/amf/common/d2nedu.c | 22 +-
src/amf/common/n2avaedu.c | 6 +-
src/amf/common/n2avamsg.c | 13 +
src/amf/common/util.c | 32 +-
tools/cluster_sim_uml/build_uml | 45 ++
56 files changed, 2852 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
*** LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES ***
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
*** PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS ***
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
*** HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC ***
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 y y
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
References
1. mailto:ajo...@rbbn.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
