------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Alex
Thanks, it looks much better.
So I tried ‘killall amf_container_demo” 10 times really quickly:
2018-08-1613:43:22.652 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO
'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container' restarts have reached
configured limit of 10
2018-08-1613:43:22.653 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO
'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container' SU restart probation
timer stopped
2018-08-1613:43:22.654 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO SU failover probation
timer started (timeout: 1200000000000 ns)
2018-08-1613:43:22.655 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO Performing failover of
'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container' (SU failover count: 1)
2018-08-1613:43:22.655 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO
'safComp=Container,safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container'
recovery action escalated from 'componentRestart' to 'suFailover'
2018-08-1613:43:22.656 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO
'safComp=Container,safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container'
faulted due to 'avaDown' : Recovery is 'suFailover'
2018-08-1613:43:22.657 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO Terminating components
of 'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container'(abruptly & unordered)
2018-08-1613:43:22.658 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO
'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container' Presence State
INSTANTIATED => TERMINATING
2018-08-1613:43:22.659 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO
'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container' Presence State
TERMINATING => TERMINATING
2018-08-1613:43:22.667 SC-1 ubuntu: CONTAINED COMP
NAME:safComp=Contained_1,safSu=SU1,safSg=Contained_2N,safApp=Contained_2N
2018-08-1613:43:22.670 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO
'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container' Presence State
TERMINATING => UNINSTANTIATED
2018-08-1613:43:22.671 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO Terminated all
components in 'safSu=SU1,safSg=Container,safApp=Container'
2018-08-1613:43:22.671 SC-1 osafamfnd[286]: NO Informing director of
sufailover
amf-state su:
safSu=SU1,safSg=Contained_2N,safApp=Contained_2N
saAmfSUAdminState=UNLOCKED(1)
saAmfSUOperState=ENABLED(1)
saAmfSUPresenceState=INSTANTIATED(3)
saAmfSUReadinessState=IN-SERVICE(2)
amf-state si:
safSi=SC-2N,safApp=OpenSAF
saAmfSIAdminState=UNLOCKED(1)
saAmfSIAssignmentState=FULLY_ASSIGNED(2)
safSi=Contained_2N_1,safApp=Contained_2N
saAmfSIAdminState=UNLOCKED(1)
saAmfSIAssignmentState=FULLY_ASSIGNED(2)
Thanks
Gary
*From: *Alex Jones <ajo...@rbbn.com>
*Organization: *Ribbon
*Date: *Thursday, 16 August 2018 at 3:41 am
*To: *Gary Lee <gary....@dektech.com.au>,
<hans.nordeb...@ericsson.com>, <ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com>,
<nagen...@hasolutions.in>
*Cc: *<opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
*Subject: *Re: [PATCH 1/1] amf: add support for container/contained [#70]
G'day Gary,
I see you were adding the XML file dynamically with "immcfg -f".
I hadn't tried that. I hadn't tried killing the sample app, either.
Here is a patch that should fix both issues. Apply it on top of
the latest big one I sent.
Alex
On 08/13/2018 10:37 PM, Gary Lee wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Alex
I modified AppConfig-container.xml and changed
saAmfSgtRedundancyModel from 4 (NwayAct) to 1 (2N).
The xml still loads and I could unlock, resulting in:
root@SC-1:/var/log# immlist safVersion=1,safSgType=Container
Name Type Value(s)
========================================================================
safVersion SA_STRING_T safVersion=1
saAmfSgtValidSuTypes SA_NAME_T
safVersion=1,safSuType=Container (32)
saAmfSgtRedundancyModel SA_UINT32_T 1 (0x1)
safSISU=safSu=SU2\,safSg=Container\,safApp=Container,safSi=Container,safApp=Container
saAmfSISUHAState=STANDBY(2)
saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
safSISU=safSu=SU1\,safSg=Container\,safApp=Container,safSi=Container,safApp=Container
saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
saAmfSISUHAReadinessState=READY_FOR_ASSIGNMENT(1)
Also, have you tried killing the amf_container_demo binary?
Thanks
Gary
On 14/08/18 05:00, Alex Jones wrote:
Hi Gary,
I just resubmitted a new patch which breaks out the
different components, and addresses the other comments here.
But, #2 (rejecting all but NWay-active for container) should
already be in there. Is there a specific test you ran that
didn't work?
Alex
On 08/13/2018 02:43 AM, Gary Lee wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email was received from an EXTERNAL sender
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Alex
Some initial comments:
0. Is it possible to split up the patch into amfd / amfnd
/ common / samples. Just makes it easier to reply inline.
1. Please compile the container demo by default, and make
amf_container_script world executable.
Eg.
diff --git a/samples/amf/Makefile.am
b/samples/amf/Makefile.am
index 447dedd..7ebf9c3 100644
--- a/samples/amf/Makefile.am
+++ b/samples/amf/Makefile.am
@@ -19,5 +19,5 @@ include $(top_srcdir)/Makefile.common
MAINTAINERCLEANFILES = Makefile.in
-SUBDIRS = sa_aware non_sa_aware wrapper proxy api_demo
+SUBDIRS = sa_aware non_sa_aware wrapper proxy api_demo
container
diff --git a/samples/amf/container/amf_container_script
b/samples/amf/container/amf_container_script
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
diff --git a/samples/configure.ac b/samples/configure.ac
index 7cf803e..9765d54 100644
--- a/samples/configure.ac
+++ b/samples/configure.ac
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ AC_CONFIG_FILES([ \
amf/wrapper/Makefile \
amf/proxy/Makefile \
amf/api_demo/Makefile \
+ amf/container/Makefile \
cpsv/Makefile \
cpsv/ckpt_demo/Makefile \
cpsv/ckpt_track_demo/Makefile \
2. We should probably reject CCBs that set
saAmfSgtRedundancyModel to anything other than
NWayActive, for Containers.
3. Do we need to bump the msg format version to
AVSV_AVD_AVND_MSG_FMT_VER_8? An old amfnd will assert if
it gets an AVSV_D2N_CONTAINED_SU_MSG_INFO msg.
Thanks
Gary
