Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Huie-Ying Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Huie-Ying Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The pam_pkcs11 module assumpts that all PKCS#11 tokens are smartcards,
>>>> so
>>>> it will display "Smart card" key word in the PAM prompt message.
>>>> However,
>>>> most of the PKCS#11 tokens are not Smart cards. so we modified some
>>>> prompt
>>>> messages to avoid confusion when
>>>> we ported this module to Solaris OS.
>>>>
>>> What are your PKCS#11 tokens? USB tokens?
>>>
>>>
>> Any PKCS#11 tokens, smartcard or no smartcard.
>>
>>> I agree with Bob, explicitly using "PKCS#11 slot" is not
>>> understandable by most users.
>>>
>>>
>> Right. I agreed with Bob's comcern about the "PKCS#11" keyword in the
>> prompt also.
>> How about changing the "Found the PKCS#11 slot with a token." message to
>> "Found the slot with a token" ?
>> Any suggestion about the message ?
>>
>>> I propose to use a configuration here. The default name would be
>>> "smart card" but the admin could use "secure token" or whatever else
>>> We could add a "token_name" parameter in the pkcs11_module
>>> configuration.
>>>
>>> # NSS (Network Security Service) config
>>> pkcs11_module nss {
>>> nss_dir = /etc/ssl/nssdb;
>>> crl_policy = none;
>>> token_name = "secure slot"
>>> }
>>>
>>> Comments?
>> Good idea. But I prefer to use "token_type" than token_name.
>
> No objection for "token_type".
>
> Can you propose a patch to implement these changes?
>
> Regards,
>
OK, I can try sometime next week.
Huie-Ying
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
