Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
OK, that's the part I was missing. The patch probably should have the translation on the sprintf rather than the prompt....On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:BTW does the _(password_prompt) do the right thing for the translation teams?In general we go that using a declaration like N_("Smart card") in the source code.
Original patch:
+ sprintf(password_prompt, "%s PIN: ", configuration->token_type);
if (configuration->use_first_pass) {
rv = pam_get_pwd(pamh, &password, NULL, PAM_AUTHTOK, 0);
} else if (configuration->try_first_pass) {
- rv = pam_get_pwd(pamh, &password, _("Smart card password: "), PAM_AUTHTOK,
+ rv = pam_get_pwd(pamh, &password, _(password_prompt), PAM_AUTHTOK,
Suggestion:
+ N_("Smart card") N_("Token) N_("Security Device") N_("Authentication
Device") /* or is this better in pam_pkcs11.conf? */
+ sprintf(password_prompt, _("%s PIN: "), _(configuration->token_type));
if (configuration->use_first_pass) {
rv = pam_get_pwd(pamh, &password, NULL, PAM_AUTHTOK, 0);
} else if (configuration->try_first_pass) {
- rv = pam_get_pwd(pamh, &password, _("Smart card password: "), PAM_AUTHTOK,
+ rv = pam_get_pwd(pamh, &password, password_prompt, PAM_AUTHTOK,
I can take care of that and propose French l10n. Bye
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
