On 1/22/09, Andreas Jellinghaus <a...@dungeon.inka.de> wrote: > the only one using the internal api is openssh, and it can be ported > to pkcs#11 - alon has done that, but it is a part of a huge change that > is unlikely to find many adopters (my personal guess - I think people > like that ssh is very easy and simple, and adding x.509 results in a quite > complex thing I guess).
It does not add X.509, you can use PKCS#11 patch without X.509 patch. > I think we should discuss this scenario: > is it ok if someone uses opensc, changes it as he likes, and published the > resulting code and binaries - with one file only published as *.o (his new > card driver)? I guess that captures the spirit of the LGPL quite nicely > and is quite usable too. (but I have not checked the wording of the LGPL > to find out if that is ok, and I'm no lawyer either...) The driver is consider plugin in FSF terms, and it needs to be GPLed as well. Alon. _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
