On 24.09.2009, at 15:59, João Poupino wrote: > On the document, there are other options explained. One looks > promising: > > bConfirmPin: 0x01 > bNumberMessage: 0x02 > Messages seen on Pinpad display: New Pin*, Confirm Pin* > > *In these two cases, old PIN is not asked by the Pinpad but do not > forget to put the old > PIN value in the APDU command. > And now it works as expected :) > > Of course, by doing this I'm breaking all other cards and it's not > very nice. Is there any way (through a flag in structure or > something) that we can signal part10_build_modify_pin_block() to > adapt its behavior depending on the type of card?
Sure, there are flags SC_PIN_CMD*. You can add a new flag and related code. It might be useful to add a similar flag to PKCS#15 layer, even if not defined in PKCS#15. When you have a similar application on multiple cards and a single emulation driver then the emulation layer information can be translated to lower flags. Check SC_PIN_CMD_NEED_PADDING and SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_NEEDS_PADDING for inspiration. -- Martin Paljak http://martin.paljak.pri.ee +372.515.6495 _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel