Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > 2. Keep the main name OpenSC. I agree that this is important. OpenSC is a good brand, it makes no sense not to use it also for the installers.
.. > > 3. Keep OpenSC core platform-agnostic: .. > > OpenSC.tokend lives outside of the (lib)opensc package, so should > > the possible future MS BaseCSP piece .. > > OpenSC *installers* for those platforms, on the other hand, must > > contain those components. > > my opinion on this differs. .. > a big fat package with several options inside on the other hand is > standard for windows: they can pick normal/minimal/everything options >From the above you actually seem to agree with each other. I also think this is good. > > This means getting rid of SCA/SCB, providing OpenSC installers > > for Mac and Windows and either providing the separate user > > software as extra downloadables or work with other software > > providers to add support for OpenSC/PKCS#11. What does "separate user software" mean, Martin? > > This is way easier if OpenSC declares somewhere what it installs, > > where and why, I agree also with this. The SCA and SCB installers are really a good thing, basically they just need to be renamed to use the OpenSC brand, and the installers themselves deserve some documentation as Martin says; what, where to and why. Not everyone will care, but it's good for those who do. //Peter _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
