Am Donnerstag 26 November 2009 19:55:02 schrieb Viktor TARASOV: > But before, I would like to know if there are any objections for > the following changes to calls of do_change() and do_unblock() in > opensc-explorer.
I like the changes. opensc-explorer is only meant as debug tool, but still each function could be improved so it can implement the various card commans. one question: unblock always works with puk? is there a way to use so-pin for unblocking too? and the text in the examples has "Set PIN" where I wonder if "unblock pin" wouldn't be better - the texts are a bit confusing right now. or do the "Set PIN" operations require a "verify" command to be executed first? anyway, improving pin handling is a good idea! the users should use pkcs#11 api or "pkcs15-tool", but it is good if low level commands for testing are available too. Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
