Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Am Donnerstag 26 November 2009 19:55:02 schrieb Viktor TARASOV: > >> But before, I would like to know if there are any objections for >> the following changes to calls of do_change() and do_unblock() in >> opensc-explorer. >> > > I like the changes. opensc-explorer is only meant as debug tool, > but still each function could be improved so it can implement > the various card commans. > > one question: unblock always works with puk? > is there a way to use so-pin for unblocking too? > > and the text in the examples has "Set PIN" where > I wonder if "unblock pin" wouldn't be better - the > texts are a bit confusing right now. > > or do the "Set PIN" operations require a "verify" command > to be executed first? >
Yes, "Set PIN" operation presumes some preliminary authentication, for ex. 'Verify SOPIN'. IMHO, such a sequence is more easy to test with opensc-explorer, then with the high-level OpenSC tool. > anyway, improving pin handling is a good idea! > the users should use pkcs#11 api or "pkcs15-tool", > but it is good if low level commands for testing are > available too. > > Regards, Andreas > > -- Viktor Tarasov <viktor.tara...@opentrust.com> _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
