Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > the biggest argument of course is: why change a working system?
But it isn't working, that's the point. It's ambiguous and unneccessary to have two addresses for the list and every now and then there are duplicate messages because a message ends up being sent to both addresses. Better to not have that. And it's also much prettier to not have the extra lists. after @. > also, it might affect every single user, if we change the email > address of the list, so that alone is a very good reason to not > do that. I don't think it needs to. At a minimum there should be forwards like there is now, just in the other direction. There could even be some rewriting (procmail+formail or such) for the @lists. addresses. > > Hm? Is anyone using email addresses @opensc-project.org ? > > 19 emails to opensc-de...@opensc-project.org, 1 to opensc-u...@opensc- > project.org Misunderstanding. I mean does anyone receive email to an address @opensc-project.org that is not for one of the lists? One argument was ease of moving the mail handling elsewhere, but if there's only really the lists to consider then changing MX in DNS already allows full freedom to move, no extra name is needed. //Peter _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
