On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 17:31 +0100, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> On 14.01.2011 16:51, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 16:00 +0100, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> >> On 14.01.2011 15:17, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 14:14 +0100, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> >>>> On 14.01.2011 13:37, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 10:20 +0100, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> >>>>>> Hello Andre,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 14.01.2011 04:24, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> >>>>>>> please have a look at PKCS#15 "6.8.2 Pin objects" for the definition 
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>> local and global PIN objects. There is no mention of storage location.
> >>>>>> There is mention of 'path'.
> >>>>>> The difference between 'global' and 'local' is that the first one can 
> >>>>>> be verified from any location on the card,
> >>>>>> the second one is 'visible' only from somewhere under the DF (or 
> >>>>>> application) where it's defined.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So, we need (or, if you like, it's useful) to have 'path' defined for 
> >>>>>> the local PINs, to be able to select it's path before verification.
> >>>> My previous assumptions comes from this citation.
> >>>> It seems that I am terribly missing something. Can you give more details?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>    From PKCS#15 6.8.2 Pin objects:
> >>>>>     "PinAttributes.path: Path to the DF in which the PIN resides. The 
> >>>>> path shall be selected
> >>>>>      by a host application before doing a PIN operation, in order to 
> >>>>> enable a suitable
> >>>>>      authentication context for the PIN operation.
> >>>> That's 'local' PIN.
> >>>>
> >>>>> If not present, a card-holder verification
> >>>>>      must always be possible to perform without a prior `SELECT' 
> >>>>> operation."
> >>>> That's the global one.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So we desperately need the 'path' for the local PINs. So that 'host 
> >>>> application' can select the path
> >>>> 'before doing a PIN operation'.
> >>>> You probably know another way to do verification from the random 
> >>>> location on the card ?
> >>> Take Java Card with PKI applet as an example. Once the applet is
> >>> selected, it is possible to perform the VERIFY command from every
> >>> location within that applet. That's 'local' PIN too. Because it's only
> >>> valid for that applet but not for the whole card.
> >>
> >> OK, let us adjust the terminology.
> >> I am talking about the PKCS#15 card. This card starts from some MF, where 
> >> exist EF.DIR, probably EF.ATR, ..., as well as application DFs.
> >> The AID of application DFs are present in the EF.DIR records.
> >> The global PINs are defined at the MF level or above, the local ones are 
> >> defined in application DFs.
> >>
> >> In my comprehension to create/use the PKCS#15 objects you don't need to 
> >> jump higher then MF, and thus to reset status of 'global' PINs.
> >> You have another vision, examples ?
> >>
> >>
> >>> BTW care must be take with re-selecting an applet in Java Cards, because
> >>> it may invalidate all previously verified PINs.
> >> The AIDs of the applets of your Java Card, are they present in some EF.DIR 
> >> ?
> >> Can its be discovered by the procedure previewed by PKCS#15 ?
> > You only need to have a default applet that can handle "SELECT 2F00" and
> > "READ BINARY" to dump EF.DIR. The next command would be a "SELECT BY
> > NAME", which is handled by the runtime environment and switches form one
> > applet to another. Now you can proceed with 5031 and 5032.
> 
> 
> Well, it seems that we are talking about the same thing.
> 
> We've gone away from the original item.
> Do you have something against committed proposal to complete the missing 
> 'path' for the local PINs when decoding AODF ?

Yes, the patch you have committed is a fix for cards not following
PKCS#15 and ISO 7816-15. Therefore it is placed wrong. Your current
proposal effects every card not only the broken ones.

"If not present, a card-holder verification must always be possible
 to perform without a prior `SELECT' operation."

Regards
Andre


_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to